GHG Report for University of Wisconsin-Stout
Submitted on September 11, 2009; last updated on September 16, 2009
Summary Statistics
Making fair comparisons between higher education institutions is always challenging due to the rich diversity of higher education. The unverified nature of the information in this database and unavailability of unbiased normalization metrics means such comparisons are even more difficult. Users should therefore approach direct institution to institution comparisons with caution and recognize that all comparisons between institutions are inherently biased.| Total | Per Full-Time Enrollment | Per 1000 Square Feet | % Offset | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross emissions (Scopes 1 + 2) | 30,229 metric tons of CO2e | 3.4 metric tons of CO2e | 12.2 metric tons of CO2e | 0% |
| Gross emissions (Scopes 1 + 2 + 3) | 38,027 metric tons of CO2e | 4.3 metric tons of CO2e | 15.4 metric tons of CO2e | 0% |
| Net emissions | 38,027 metric tons of CO2e | 4.3 metric tons of CO2e | 15.4 metric tons of CO2e | N/A |
Emissions Inventory Methodology and Boundaries
| Start date of the 12-month period covered in this report | July 1, 2008 |
| Consolidation methodology used to determine organizational boundaries | Operational control approach |
|
If any institution-owned, leased, or operated buildings or other holdings that should fall within the organizational boundaries are omitted, briefly explain why.
None |
|
| Emissions calculation tool used | Clean Air-Cool Planet |
|
Please describe why this tool was selected.
It was recommended by ACUPCC. |
|
|
Please describe the source(s) of the emissions coefficients used.
CA-CP Campus Carbon Calculator's default emissions coefficents |
|
| Which version of IPCC's list of global warming potentials did you use? | Third Assessment Report |
| Who primarily conducted this emissions inventory? | Student researcher(s) |
|
Please describe the process of conducting the inventory.
See attached files |
|
|
Please describe any emissions sources that were classified as de minimis and explain how a determination of the significance of these emissions was made.
No information provided |
|
|
Please describe any data limitations related to this submission and any major assumptions made in response to these limitations.
Our previous submission used version 5 of the CA-CP. We transfered the data into the version 6.3 CA-CP tool. However, because this version used projections rather than the actual data for fiscal year 2009 emissions summaries, the tool was altered to accept the actual data when caclulating total emissions. This alteration was done by unprotecting the 2009 data cells, and copying the formulas from the 2008 cells. The figures presented here and the attached Excel spreadsheet reflect these alterations. |
|
Emissions Data
Emissions from the following sources (in metric tons of CO2e)
| Scope 1 Emissions | |
|---|---|
| Stationary Combustion | 11,870.0 metric tons of CO2e |
| Mobile Combustion | 188.0 metric tons of CO2e |
| Process Emissions | 0.0 metric tons of CO2e |
| Fugitive Emissions | 8.0 metric tons of CO2e |
| Total Scope 1 emissions | 12,066.0 metric tons of CO2e |
| Scope 2 Emissions | |
| Purchased Electricity | 18,163.0 metric tons of CO2e |
| Purchased Heating | 0.0 metric tons of CO2e |
| Purchased Cooling | 0.0 metric tons of CO2e |
| Purchased Steam | 0.0 metric tons of CO2e |
| Total Scope 2 emissions | 18,163.0 metric tons of CO2e |
| Scope 3 Emissions | |
| Commuting | 6,081.0 metric tons of CO2e |
| Air Travel | 1,351.0 metric tons of CO2e |
| Solid Waste | 366.0 metric tons of CO2e |
| Total Scope 3 emissions | 7,798.0 metric tons of CO2e |
| Biogenic Emissions | |
| Biogenic Emissions from Stationary Combustion | No information provided |
| Biogenic Emissions from Mobile Combustion | No information provided |
Mitigation Data
| Carbon Offsets | |
|---|---|
| Carbon offsets purchased | No information provided |
| Offset verification program(s) | No information provided |
|
Description of offsets purchased (including vendor, project source, etc.)
No information provided |
|
| Renewable Energy Certificates (RECs) | |
| Total RECs purchased | None kWh |
| Percent of total electricity consumption mitigated through the purchase of RECs | None % |
| Emissions reductions due to the purchase of RECs | No information provided |
| REC verification program(s) | No information provided |
|
Description of RECs purchased (including vendor, project source, etc.)
No information provided |
|
| Sequestration and Carbon Storage | |
| Sequestration due to land owned by the institution | No information provided |
|
Description of how sequestration was calculated
No information provided |
|
| Carbon storage due to composting | No information provided |
Normalization and Contextual Data
| Building Space | |
|---|---|
| Gross square feet of building space | 2,476,238.0 sq ft |
| Net assignable square feet of laboratory space | No information provided |
| Net assignable square feet of health care space | No information provided |
| Net assignable square feet of residential space | No information provided |
| Population | |
| Total Student Enrollment (FTE) | 8839.0 |
| Residential Students | 3015 |
| Full-time Commuter Students | 4163 |
| Part-time Commuter Students | 1661 |
| Non-Credit Students | No information provided |
| Full-time Faculty | 346 |
| Part-time Faculty | 90 |
| Full-time Staff | 642 |
| Part-time Staff | 98 |
| Other Contextual Data | |
| Endowment Size | No information provided |
| Heating Degree Days | No information provided |
| Cooling Degree Days | No information provided |
|
Please describe any circumstances specific to your institution that provide context for understanding your greenhouse gas emissions this year.
No information provided |
|
Supporting Documentation
| Completed inventory narrative |
UW-Stout Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory FY09 Update Download |
| Completed inventory calculator | Download |
Auditing and Verification
These emissions data have been audited, verified, or peer-reviewed.|
Please briefly describe this verification, if any.
The data was reviewed by the project manager. |