ACUPCC Reporting System

GHG Report for Antioch University Seattle

Submitted on March 3, 2011; last updated on March 3, 2011

Summary Statistics

Making fair comparisons between higher education institutions is always challenging due to the rich diversity of higher education. The unverified nature of the information in this database and unavailability of unbiased normalization metrics means such comparisons are even more difficult. Users should therefore approach direct institution to institution comparisons with caution and recognize that all comparisons between institutions are inherently biased.
Total Per Full-Time Enrollment Per 1000 Square Feet % Offset
Gross emissions (Scopes 1 + 2) 24 metric tons of CO2e 0.0 metric tons of CO2e 0.4 metric tons of CO2e 16%
Gross emissions (Scopes 1 + 2 + 3) 748 metric tons of CO2e 0.9 metric tons of CO2e 13.3 metric tons of CO2e 1%
Net emissions 745 metric tons of CO2e 0.9 metric tons of CO2e 13.3 metric tons of CO2e N/A

Emissions Inventory Methodology and Boundaries

Start date of the 12-month period covered in this report January 1, 2010
Consolidation methodology used to determine organizational boundaries No information provided
If any institution-owned, leased, or operated buildings or other holdings that should fall within the organizational boundaries are omitted, briefly explain why.

None

Emissions calculation tool used Clean Air-Cool Planet
Please describe why this tool was selected.

We used the updated version of the Clean Air-Cool Planet tool to remain consistent in our reporting.

Please describe the source(s) of the emissions coefficients used.

No information provided

Which version of IPCC's list of global warming potentials did you use? No information provided
Who primarily conducted this emissions inventory? Student researcher(s)
Please describe the process of conducting the inventory.

Our process was broad and intensive. We interviewed staff and faculty from many departments across the University to gain specific information for each relevant category. We conducted a campus-wide Transportation Survey which resulted in over 15% participation. Finally, we created a resource list in order streamline the process for the future.

Please describe any emissions sources that were classified as de minimis and explain how a determination of the significance of these emissions was made.

N/A

Please describe any data limitations related to this submission and any major assumptions made in response to these limitations.

Our primary limitation is the lack of specific transportation data for students, staff, and faculty, respectively. We conducted a survey last fall which was an improvement from the previous year, but still had limitations. We plan to further improve the survey in the coming year.

Emissions Data

Emissions from the following sources (in metric tons of CO2e)

Scope 1 Emissions
Stationary Combustion 0.0 metric tons of CO2e
Mobile Combustion 0.0 metric tons of CO2e
Process Emissions 0.0 metric tons of CO2e
Fugitive Emissions 0.0 metric tons of CO2e
Total Scope 1 emissions 0.0 metric tons of CO2e
Scope 2 Emissions
Purchased Electricity 24.2 metric tons of CO2e
Purchased Heating 0.0 metric tons of CO2e
Purchased Cooling 0.0 metric tons of CO2e
Purchased Steam 0.0 metric tons of CO2e
Total Scope 2 emissions 24.2 metric tons of CO2e
Scope 3 Emissions
Commuting 640.4 metric tons of CO2e
Air Travel 48.1 metric tons of CO2e
Solid Waste 19.1 metric tons of CO2e
wastewater 0.4 metric tons of CO2e
paper 13.7 metric tons of CO2e
T and D losses 2.4 metric tons of CO2e
Total Scope 3 emissions 724.1 metric tons of CO2e
Biogenic Emissions
Biogenic Emissions from Stationary Combustion 0.0 metric tons of CO2e
Biogenic Emissions from Mobile Combustion 0.0 metric tons of CO2e

Mitigation Data

Carbon Offsets
Carbon offsets purchased 0.0 metric tons of CO2e
Offset verification program(s) No information provided
Description of offsets purchased (including vendor, project source, etc.)

No information provided

Renewable Energy Certificates (RECs)
Total RECs purchased None kWh
Percent of total electricity consumption mitigated through the purchase of RECs 15.0 %
Emissions reductions due to the purchase of RECs 3.8 metric tons of CO2e
REC verification program(s) Other
Description of RECs purchased (including vendor, project source, etc.)

Seattle City Light

Sequestration and Carbon Storage
Sequestration due to land owned by the institution No information provided
Description of how sequestration was calculated

No information provided

Carbon storage due to composting No information provided

Normalization and Contextual Data

Building Space
Gross square feet of building space 56,127.0 sq ft
Net assignable square feet of laboratory space 0.0 sq ft
Net assignable square feet of health care space 0.0 sq ft
Net assignable square feet of residential space 0.0 sq ft
Population
Total Student Enrollment (FTE) 836.0
Residential Students No information provided
Full-time Commuter Students 401
Part-time Commuter Students 435
Non-Credit Students No information provided
Full-time Faculty 54
Part-time Faculty 75
Full-time Staff 70
Part-time Staff 9
Other Contextual Data
Endowment Size 374236
Heating Degree Days No information provided
Cooling Degree Days No information provided
Please describe any circumstances specific to your institution that provide context for understanding your greenhouse gas emissions this year.

The greenhouse gas emissions from student, staff and faculty commuting make up the bulk of the emissions associated with Antioch University Seattle. As a non-residential institution, we will face this problem into the future. We are working on plans to educate and incentivize carpooling and public transit participation. We look froward to tracking our progress through the years with the Clean Air-Cool Planet calculator.

Supporting Documentation

Completed inventory narrative AUS 2009 GHG emissions update
Download
Completed inventory calculator Download

Auditing and Verification

These emissions data have been audited, verified, or peer-reviewed.
Please briefly describe this verification, if any.

The update was reviewed by the campus sustainability coordinator (also a faculty member) and the results were presented to the Sustainability Task Force.